INTERNATIONAL INTERDYSCYPLINARNY SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL CZ-WNS     ISSN 2544-3437
INTERNATIONAL INTERDYSCYPLINARNY SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL CZ-WNS ISSN 2544-3437

Original research papers and letters to the editor of INTERNATIONAL INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL CZ-WNS. Both should contain an Abstract (of up to 250-500 words) and a Conclusion section.

Welcome to our Journal Author Instruction

Submit manuscripts as e-mail attachment to the Editorial Office at: iisj.czwns.yournal@gmail.com
 A manuscript number will be mailed to the corresponding author same day or within 72 hours. Once you have chosen where to publish, you must prepare your manuscript according to the requirements of the publisher. You may publish your research in books, journals or conference proceedings

  • Instructions to authors
  • Structuring your manuscript
  • Submission of the manuscript
  • The peer-review process
  • Preprint and publication

Instructions to authors

A key point when publishing in journals is to familiarise yourself with the formal requirements concerning manuscript submission. These requirements are found in the author guidelines, or instructions to authors, commonly found on the journal’s web pages. The formal requirements include both the content and layout, and the technical requirements for submitting a manuscript. You will also find information about the journal’s Open Access policy. Your funding source or employer may have specific regulations when it comes to Open Access. You need to consider co-authorship and copyright to ensure your rights as an author are not violated.  Structuring your manuscript

Meta-information

The  meta-information  of the article is very important, it makes your article searchable and retrievable. Without it, your peers may never find the article. The meta-information consists of the title, authors with affiliations, keywords and abstract of the article. These are the elements that are indexed in scientific literature databases, and thus determine what searches will find your article.

  • Title:  The title is essential;  a good title is informative, yet catchy. The title has to be focused and specific enought to indicate the content of the article. Though it can be tempting to play around and find a unique title, this does not always go down well with the journal editors.
  • Authors, addresses and affiliations: Supply the names and addresses of all authors. Indicate clearly who is the corresponding author of the article. There are ethical aspects to consider when discussing co-authorship, and also variations between the disciplines and fields of research as to what constitutes authorship and co-authorship.  An author may have more than one affiliation; if so, this should be clearly indicated. A typical example would be both the employer institution and the institution funding your research.
  • Keywords: These are given by the authors and the journal. The keywords are essential in retrieving the paper from a literature search. Take some time in deciding on your keywords; both your subject matter and your intended audience can influence your choice of keywords. The journal may ask you to provide standardised keywords such as the Medical Subject Headings used in Pubmed.
  • Abstract: This is your story in a nutshell,  designed to tease your reader to read the whole paper.  Focus on using  appropriate words and formulations; a well-phrased and well-organised abstract is what will get the readers’ attention. For some article types and in some journals your abstract will have to be structured in the same way as the main body of your article.

Content of the article

The classic scientific article has the following chapters:  Introduction, Methods, Results and Discussion. This structure is commonly refeered to as IJCR.  Journals across the scientific disciplines employ variations of this structure in their articles.

  • Introduction: This section is where you give the context for your work. It must contain a general background both for your subject and specifically for this work. You should include:
  1. why the study was undertaken, and why it is important
  2. a review of the relevant literature
  3. the research questions and a brief mention of the chosen methods
  4. the hypotheses
  • Methods/Materials and Methods: In this section you will provide information on the methods of your study. Verifiability is a central principle in the sciences and you should provide enough details of your methods for the results to be re-tested. Important aspects of this section are:
  1. When, where and how the study was done
  2. What materials were used
  3. Description of the study group (patients, species etc.)
  4. Consider presenting material in tables and figures instead of text only
  • Results: This chapter gives a general description of the experiment and presents the data, including:
  1. what answers were found to the research questions
  2. data often presented in figures and tables with corresponding captions. Instructions to authors will in detail show how to present tables and figures.

References and acknowledgements

References and citing: Continuously discussing your work in relation to the works of others is an essential feature of academic writing and part of what makes a work verifiable. Throughout your article you will cite the works of others. Citing in the text and the reference list is done by following specific reference styles that are given in the journal’s instructions to the author. It is recommended to use a reference tool to save time and to handle and structure the large information load. You can read more about this in Reference Managers. The frequency of citations is additionally an important bibliometric tool in formal evaluation of research.

Acknowledgements: No work is done in isolation and you should show your appreciation for the help you have received. It can be challenging to decide who should be listed as co-authors and who should be listed as contributors to be thanked in the acknowledgements. Submission

Cover letter: When submitting a manuscript to a journal, it is common to include a cover letter to the editor. The letter contains information concerning your submission. Common points to address are:

  • Are you publishing several works from the same material? Or have parts of the work been published previously?
  • Are there any conflicts of interest?
  • If you have co-authors, have all of them had the opportunity to read and approve the manuscript?
  • As a corresponding author, you will need to give your name and the adress of your institution.

Manuscript file: The requirements of  the file format, including text, figures and tables, will vary for different journals and editors. You must pay heed to such details as page numbers and double spacing. Some journals have separate formatting rules according to the type of article. Most journals have a web-based, electronic submission system.

Response to peer reviewers: If the manuscript is a resubmission after revisions, the response should be formulated according to the instructions to authors.

Accessibility to the data: Sometimes it is essential for the readers to have access to the data behind the article. There are several options as to how and where to store the data in order to make them accessible. Certain research domains have large data archives, and you will be expected to deposit your data there. The journal itself may provide storage space for the data as a supplement to the article, or your institution may provide a service for data archives.

The peer-review process

“Manuscript would need to be revised to comply with the requirements of our journal”.
Letter from an editor

A manuscript submitted to a peer-reviewed journal will be sent to a number of referees chosen by the journal editors. These referees are researchers working in the field within the scope of the journal, and are often experts in the field that the manuscript cover. The referees will together with the editors screen the manuscript and ask questions such as:

  • Does the study have an original scholarly or scientific message ?
  • Do the message, content and topic fit the scope of the journal?
  • Does the work make a useful and exciting contribution to the research field?
  • Is the work focused and presented in a logical manner,  so that the reader will understand the authors’ conclusions?
  • Is the language clear?
  • Does the manuscript follow the journal’s instructions to authors?

“Unsuitable for our readership”.

Letter from an editor

The outcome of the peer-review may be:

  • Acceptance of the manuscript without revisions
  • Acceptance with minor or major revisions
  • Rejection of the manuscript

The referees will often provide new views on the work, with suggestions for further improvement of the manuscript. Use these comments to improve the manuscript for any re-submission. If  your manuscript  is rejected, be even more  stringent in choosing another journal to submit to,  since it is unnecessary work to choose a journal which require a total change in structure and layout. Once your manuscript has been accepted for publication, you will receive a manuscript proof that you have to read carefully, to check that there are no printing or layout errors.

Guidelines for authors